Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Wed 15/05/24 03:08:59 GMT |
Message # 5275.1 Subject: I had been wondering... Date: Wed 13/08/03 22:59:36 GMT Name: NCgreg Email: ncgreg231@hotmail.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Hey Sopping, I had not realized that those neo-victorian were not yours, although it was always slightly puzzling that the Lord Sopping stories seemed to have a slightly different style than your recollected stories. Speaking of Lord Sopping, has that person ever posted here? Speaking of Todd Stories page, does anyone know if there will be a return/replacement?
-Greg |
In reply to Message (5275) To leonmoomin with gratitude
By Sopping - Wed 13/08/03 02:25:45 GMT I did not want to get this buried a few postings below, hence this new posting.
1. To keep the record straight. One "Lord Sopping" ahs been posting neovictorian wetlook stories to the late-lamented Todd Stories site. It was not, repeat, NOT me.
2.I have posting as "Sopping" here, at jowc, WetCasual, TotalWetlook, and elsewhere for the past three years.
3. That being said, leonmoomins Paris photos are all that is really good about wetlool. There are lovely girls, fully clothed, totally drenched, and incomparably sexy in such. As a Yank, I am not entitled to the word "smashing" but they really truly are!
It should illustrate the gulf or divide between those who display true "wetlook" from those who use wetlook as a vehicle to promote bimbo-oriented displays of boobs, crotches, and the concept that 'wet clothing" means a transparent rag topside, over a thong.
Thanks L:, Eric, Brian and a few others for demonstrating the true, and illustrated "joys" of wet clothing in the delightful young ladies you have photographed in this most fortuitous heatwave.
I rest my case.
S:
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.023 seconds to generate ]